The High Court dismissed the appeal in an S.B. Civil case where the appellant sought possession. The court held that since possession had already been handed over to the respondents, no substantial question of law remained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/007236]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 102/2022
Rakesh S/o Late Shri Pyare Lal Kumawat, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Behind Nathdwara Temple, Nathdwara, Distt. Rajsamand (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Karuna Nedhi Vyas with Mr. Sharad Vyas
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
22/03/2023
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that possession of the premises has been handed over to the respondents.
A perusal of the record shows that the notices in the present appeal were issued only on the limited point of granting some time to the appellant to vacate the premises.
As now the possession has been handed over, no ground remains in the present appeal. No substantial question of law is
[2023/RJJD/007236]
[CSA-102/2022]
(2 of 2)
therefore made out in the present appeal and the same is therefore, dismissed .
(REKHA BORANA),J
43-AbhishekS/-
Rakesh S/o Late Shri Pyare Lal Kumawat
1. Goswami Kalyanrai S/o Shri Lilasth Goswami Girdharlal Ji Maharaj
2. Smt. Chandrakala W/o Late Shri Pyare Lal Kumawat
3. Kamlesh S/o Late Shri Pyare Lal
4. Smt. Rajni D/o Late Shri Pyare Lal Kumawat
5. Radha D/o Late Shri Pyare Lal Kumawat
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
