The High Court directed the superintendent to hear the petitioners' grievance and provided for security if necessary, then disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to the Superintendent of Police to hear petitioners and provide adequate security if necessitated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/010013]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 503/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vimal Kumar Maheshwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Bhati, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
13/04/2023
The petitioners have preferred this criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for protection of Life and Liberty from the private respondent.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara, who shall hear the grievance of
[2023/RJJD/010013]
[CRLW-503/2023]
(2 of 2)
the petitioners and if necessitated, provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.
Consequently, the present criminal writ petition stands disposed
of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
8-Ishan/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners require protection of life and liberty from the private respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pushpa Devi D/o Mohan Lal Balai
Lumb Singh Rawat @ Kailash
State Of Rajasthan
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
