Disposed

Sejal Ramkumar Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Dec 2023CRLW/2093/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking directions for police protection against a private respondent after apprehending a threat to the petitioners' life and liberty. The Court directed the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police with grievances for necessary action.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioners to appear before the concerned Superintendent of Police with appropriate representation regarding their grievance.

Sejal Ramkumar Yadav Vs State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2093/2023

¶3

Sejal Ramkumar Yadav W/o Pramod Choudhary, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Second Floor, Sai Ganesh Apartment, Virar Road Moregaon, Talav Javal, Moregaon, Vasai, Nalasopara, East Thane (Maharashtra) At Present Reside At Choudharyo Ka Bas Basni Jojawar, Tehsil Marwar Junction, District Pali (Raj.).

¶4

Pramod Choudhary S/o Oka Ram Ji, Aged About 21 Years, R/o B/03, Sai Kripa Chal, Tullnj Road, Near Divine School Sita Ram Nagar, Kajupada, Nallasopara East, Thane (Maharashtra) At Present Reside At Choudharyo Ka Bas, Basni Jojawar, Tehsil Marwar Junction, Dist. Pali (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶8

The Superintendent Of Police, Pali (Raj.).

¶9

S.h.o., P.s. Siryari, Dist. Pali (Raj.). 4. Sarita Yadavq W/o Jitesh Yadav, R/o Tullnj Road, Near Divine School Sita Ram Nagar, Kajupada, Nallasopara East, Thane (Maharashtra).

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Goyal. For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order

¶13

15/12/2023

¶14

The petitioners have preferred this Writ Petition under under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution Of India for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondent No.4.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLW-2093/2023]

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life, limb and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same. Being the citizens of independent India, the petitioners have right to reside with honour and dignity. Therefore, they have sought the protection from the hands of private respondents and they also sought direction to respondents to provide them protection.

¶17

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, since the petitioners apprehend threat to their right of life and liberty, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioners have every right to seek the protection of their life, limb and liberty; and therefore persuade to dispose of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the concerned Superintendent of Police along with appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The concerned Superintendent of Police shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶18

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

¶19

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶20

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶21

620-sumer/-

Sejal Ramkumar Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sejal Ramkumar Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brijendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishan Pareek Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamaldeen Vs State

Manoj Vs State of Rajasthan

Muskan Bano Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonal Baheti Vs State of Rajasthan