Shahabuddin v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the criminal revision petition in part. It upheld the conviction for theft but reduced the substantive sentence to the period already undergone due to trial delays and waived the fine.
What did the court decide?
Sentence reduced to period already undergone; fine waived; appellant released on bail; bonds discharged.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:43588]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 412/2007
Shahabuddin S/o Sh. Mohd., B/c Mohammedan, R/o Silmagra Mohalla, Merta City, District Nagaur.
(Presently lodged in Sub-Jail, Balotra) ----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajathan through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Shah For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP with Mr. CP Marwan
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Judgment
13/12/2023
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence awarded by the trial court and upheld by the appellate court should be reduced to the period already undergone given the delay in trial.
Whether the fine imposed should be waived in light of the delay and time served.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shahabuddin S/o Sh. Mohd.
- respondent
State of Rajathan
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/412/2007
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court