The petitioners' counsel submitted that the criminal miscellaneous petition had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition on this ground without engaging with substantive legal questions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:24010]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 878/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
20/09/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition has become infructuous.
[2023:RJ-JP:24010]
[CRLMP-878/2020]
(2 of 2)
Consequently, this criminal misc. petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
1294-Nirmala
Deepak Bharadwaj
Teena Nama
State Of Rajasthan
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
