Allowed

Mahesh Chand Yadav Son of Shri Samay Singh Yadav, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Sept 2023CRLMP/1979/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan bench held that the FIR No.66/2022 registered under Sections 420, 406, and 120-B IPC is liable to be quashed in view of the compromise arrived at between the petitioners and the complainant. The petitions were allowed and the FIR quashed and set aside.

What did the court decide?

The criminal miscellaneous petitions are allowed, FIR No.66/2022 is quashed and set aside, and the stay application is disposed of.

Mahesh Chand Yadav Son of Shri Samay Singh Yadav, Vs… — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:24458]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1979/2023

¶4

Mahesh Chand Yadav Son Of Shri Samay Singh Yadav, Resident Of 8-Ma, Indra Gandhi Nagar Jagatpura Jaipur (Raj).

¶5

Ravi Yadav Son Of Shri Mahesh Chand Yadav, Resident Of 8-Ma, Indra Gandhi Nagar Jagatpura Jaipur (Raj).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶9

Superintendent Of Police, Dausa.

¶10

Station House Officer, Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa.

¶11

Investigation Officer, Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa.

¶12

Pankaj Singh Gurjar Son Of Shri Hansram Gurjar, Resident Of Kesra Mandawar Dausa.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

Connected With

¶15

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5805/2023

¶16

Shelender Yadav S/o Shri Mahesh Chand Yadav, R/o Village Doroli, Teh- Sahajpura ( Rural) Kherli, District Alwar (Raj). Presently Resides At Plot No. 8/m A, Indra Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj).

¶17

Rahul Yadav S/o Balram Yadav, R/o Butyana, District Alwar (Raj).

¶18

Mukul Solanki S/o Sanjay Solanki, R/o H.no. 59, Pooth Kalan, Delhi.

¶19

Abhishek S/o Ramsawrup, R/o H.no. A-84, Adarsh Nagar, Rohatk, Haryana.

¶20

----Petitioners

¶21

Versus

¶22

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Learned Public Prosecutor.

¶23

Pankaj Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Hans Ram Gurjar, R/o Kesra Mandawar, P.s. Mandawar, District Dausa (Raj).

¶24

[CRLMP-1979/2023]

¶25

[2023:RJ-JP:24458]	(2 of 3)	[CRLMP-1979/2023 ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vijay Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, Mr. Avinash Kumar	PP

¶26

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶27

Order

¶28

18/09/2023

¶29

The petitioners and the complainant are present in person and have been duly identified by their respective counsel.

¶30

By way of these criminal misc. petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.66/2022 registered at Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B of IPC.

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the investigation, the petitioners have entered into a compromise with the complainant. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the aforesaid factual position. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal; considering that the parties have resolved their dispute and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab &

¶32

Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors.

(3 of 3)

[2023:RJ-JP:24458]

[CRLMP-1979/2023]

[ AIR 1992 SC 604 ] , the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶37

In view of the above, these criminal misc. petitions are allowed and the FIR No.66/2022 registered at Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.

¶38

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶39

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶40

1435-1436-Nirmala

Mahesh Chand Yadav Son of Shri Samay Singh Yadav, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Chand Yadav Son of Shri Samay Singh Yadav, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kapil Dev Son of Shri Shambhu Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Bipul Sheel S/O Boloram Vs State of Rajasthan

Akbar Khan S/O Shri Kamruddin Khan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Praveen Chand Nahar S/O Late Shri Santosh Chand Nahar Vs State of Rajasthan

Harshid Khan S/O Abud Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Jasveer Singh @ Jasveer Chaudhary S/O Shri Aatmaram Saharan, Vs State of Rajasthan