Dismissed

Jeevani v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Jul 2023CRLMP/3037/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed two misc. petitions for quashing FIR No. 172/2023 under various IPC sections. The High Court, noting the charge-sheet was filed and one petitioner was exonerated by police, held the petitions were infructuous and dismissed them, deciding associated stay petitions accordingly. (Judgment Date: 25/07/2023)

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed as infructuous; stay petitions dismissed.

Jeevani Vs State of Rajasthan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:23182]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3616/2023

¶4

Bhajan Lal S/o Moolaram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Chack 1 8 A Tehsil Anupgarh Dist. Sriganganagar

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

Rukma Devi W/o Bhajanlal, R/o Chack 27 A Anupgarh Dist. Sriganganagar

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3037/2023

¶12

Jeevani W/o Moolaram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Chack 8A Tehsil Anupgarh, District Sriganganagar.

¶13

Dharmender Kumar S/o Chimnaram, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Chack 8A Tehsil Anupgarh, District Sriganganagar.

¶14

Manphool Ram S/o Sona Ram, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Chack 8A Tehsil Anupgarh, District Sriganganagar.

¶15

Suman D/o Dharmender Kumar, Aged About 20 Years, R/ o Chack 2Lm, Tehsil Anupgarh, District Sriganganagar.

¶16

Reshma Bai W/o Jeet Ram, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Chack 2Lm, Tehsil Anupgarh, District Sriganganagar.

¶17

----Petitioners

¶18

Versus

¶19

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Rukma Devi W/o Bhajanlal, R/o Chack 27 A Anupgarh District Sriganganagar.

¶20

----Respondents

¶21

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP

¶22

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶23

Order

¶24

25/07/2023

¶25

Misc(Pet.) No. 3616/2023

¶26

The instant misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the FIR No.172/2023 registered at Police Station

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-3616/2023]

[2023:RJ-JD:23182]

Anoopgarh, District Sriganganagar for offences under Sections 498-A, 494, 420, 114 and 120-B of IPC.

¶31

Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a report wherein it has been mentioned that after investigation Police has already filed charge-sheet in this case before the competent Court. The said report is hereby taken on record.

¶32

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay petition also stands decided.

¶33

Misc(Pet.) No. 3037/2023

¶34

The instant misc. petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the FIR No172/2023 registered at Police Station Anoopgarh, District Sriganganagar for offences under Sections 498-A, 494, 420, 114 and 120-B of IPC.

¶35

Learned Public Prosecutor submitted a report wherein it has been mentioned that charge-sheet has been filed against coaccused Bhajan Lal and the present petitioners have been exonerated by the Police. The said report is hereby taken on record.

¶36

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present misc. petition has become infructuous and dismissed accordingly. Stay petition also stands dismissed.

¶37

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶38

67-68-Rashi/-

Jeevani v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeevani v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Arora Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravindra Singh Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Om Prakash Vs State

C T O Churu Vs M/S Pradeep Kumar Jain

Manish Singh Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Hina Hanjwani Vs State of Rajasthan