Allowed

Anuj Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Nov 2023CRLMB/8793/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted bail to the petitioner, who was in judicial custody for offences under Sections 420, 406, 409, 418, and 423 IPC. The Court held it just and proper to grant bail without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. executing a bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/each.

Anuj Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:39712]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8793/2023

¶4

Anuj Kumar S/o Shri Indraj, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Civil Lines, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Hanumangarh)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. DS Thind For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP Mr. RC Joshi

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶11

Order

¶12

20/11/2023

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.12/2023 of Police Station Hanumangarh Town, District Hanumangarh for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 409, 418, 423 of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offences are triable by Magistrate. Challan of the case has been presented. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

[2023:RJ-JD:39712]

[CRLMB-8793/2023]

(2 of 2)

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Anuj Kumar S/o Shri Indraj, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.12/2023 of Police Station Hanumangarh Town, District Hanumangarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶22

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG), J

¶23

68-raksha/-

Anuj Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anuj Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Rajasthan Vs Anop Singh

Sandeep Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Arya Samaj Mandir Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Tirtha Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandra Mohan @ Mintu Vs State of Rajasthan

Kaana Ram @ Kanaram Vs State of Rajasthan