Partly allowed

Sandeep Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Nov 2023CRLMB/10024/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Garg allowed bail for Hanuman Das in connection with Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC, granting liberty upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties. The court dismissed the connected bail application filed by Sandeep Kumar as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner Hanuman Das enlarged on bail; personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. Connected bail application by Sandeep Kumar dismissed.

Sandeep Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:39457]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14483/2023

¶4

Hanuman Das S/o Barju Das, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Rayavali Tehsil Suratgarh, Dist. Sri Ganganagar. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Suratgarh)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Baalbeer S/o Rajendra, R/o Rajpura Pipren, Tehsil Suratgarh, Dist. Sri Ganganagar.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10024/2023 Sandeep Kumar S/o Hanumanram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Chak 4 Ml, Tehsil Gharsana Dist. Sri Ganganagar Raj.

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Jitendra Ojha
	Mr.	R.C. Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Javed Gauri,PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶17

Order

¶18

17/11/2023

¶19

Bail Application No. 14483/2023

¶20

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.342/2023 registered at Police Station Suratgarh City, District

[CRLMB-14483/2023]

[2023:RJ-JD:39457]

(2 of 3)

Sriganganagar for the offence punishable under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioner is triable by Magistrate. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶26

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶27

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

¶28

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶29

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Hanuman Das S/o Barju Das shall be enlarged on bail in FIR No.342/2023 registered at Police Station Suratgarh City, District Sriganganagar provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶30

Bail Application No. 10024/2023

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent event the present criminal misc. bail application has become infructuous.

¶32

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-14483/2023]

¶33

[2023:RJ-JD:39457]

¶34

In these circumstances, the present criminal misc. bail application filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶35

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶36

133-134-Rashi/-

Sandeep Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurdeep Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sandeep Singh @ Shipu Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan

Balkaran Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

State of Rajasthan Vs Anop Singh

Arya Samaj Mandir Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.