Allowed

Abid S/O Shri Mohammed Wasim v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Apr 2023CRLMB/765/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a rape case without expressing an opinion on the merits. The order was issued considering the petitioner's prolonged incarceration, with compliance directed from the trial Court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner admitted to regular bail with a direction to send a copy of the order to the concerned trial Court for necessary compliance.

Abid S/O Shri Mohammed Wasim Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/006136]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3^rd Bail Application No. 765/2023

¶4

Abid S/o Shri Mohammed Wasim, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Bada P.s. Chandoti Distt. Gaya ( Bihar) Presently 1476, Vijay Nagar, Kacchi Basti, Bihari Ka Teela, Ps. Bhatta Basti, Jaipur ( North) (Raj.) ( Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Sharma. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶11

Order

¶12

10/04/2023

¶13

The present 3^rd bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.98/2021 registered at Police Station Batta Basti Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 376, 376(2)(D) of IPC.

¶14

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the FIR has been lodged after a delay of six months of the incident. Counsel further submits that it is case of consensual sex and the statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded during trial. Counsel further submits that the conclusion of the trial may take long time and the petitioner is behind the bars since 19.03.2021.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

[2023/RJJP/006136]

[CRLMB-765/2023]

(2 of 2)

Considering the material on record and trial and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner is behind the bars since 19.03.2021 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioner be admitted to regular bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶20

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶21

MG/43

Abid S/O Shri Mohammed Wasim v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abid S/O Shri Mohammed Wasim v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ocean Greenhouse Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Punjab National Bank

Suresh Kumar Saini S/O Girdhari Lal Saini Vs Registrar, University of Rajasthan

Dilip Kumar S/O Sh. Hari Ram Vs Smt. Rameshwari W/O Sh. Babulal Ramchandani

Govind Prasad Arya Son of Shri Rameshwar Prasad Vs Satyanaraian Sharma Son of Late Shri Govind Sahai Vaidh

Leeladhar Saini S/O Shri Laxman Ram Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Toofan Singh Son of Shri Kaluram Vs the State of Rajasthan