The single-judge bench dismissed a bail cancellation application as infructuous due to the efflux of time.
The bail cancellation application is dismissed as it has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/006125]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 19/2022
Leeladhar Saini S/o Shri Laxman Ram Saini, R/o Dhani Buras, Village Katlipura, Tan Pachlangi, P.s. Udaipurwadi, District Jhunjhunu.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Sudhir Jain |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, PP |
| Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya, for the complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
10/04/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the present bail cancellation application has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the present bail cancellation application stands dismissed, as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /38
Leeladhar Saini
State Of Rajasthan
Sunil Kumar
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
