Allowed

Harendra @ Heera Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jan 2023CRLMB/696/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan allowed the third bail application of the petitioner arrested for offences under IPC and Arms Act. Despite the Public Prosecutor's opposition, the Court granted bail citing the long custody period, limited witnesses examined, and bail for a similarly situated co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail via personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/each.

Harendra @ Heera Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous III Bail Application No. 696/2023

¶3

Harendra @ Heera Ram S/o Sh. Jetha Ram, Aged About 24 Years, Dade Ki Beri, Dasaniya P.s. Shergarh, Dist. Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Sumer Singh Gour
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. AR Choudhary,PP

¶9

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶10

Order

¶11

17/01/2023

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.206/2017 Police Station Sardarpura, Jodhpur City West for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 & 120-B of IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. He has preferred this third bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that out of total 68 witnesses only 5 witness have been examined. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody for about five years and two months.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused person, namely, Bhoma Ram has already been enlarged on bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-696/2023]

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the material available on record.

¶19

Thus, having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that similarly situated co-accused person has been granted bail and conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, this third bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Harendra @ Heera Ram S/o Sh. Jetha Ram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.206/2017 Police Station Sardarpura, Jodhpur City West provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶22

22-Sudheer/-

Harendra @ Heera Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harendra @ Heera Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taruna Vs State of Rajasthan

Pay Sense Service India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

Dhana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Prashant Legha Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Bishnoi Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagirath Godara Vs State of Rajasthan