Justice Uma Shanker Vyas dismissed S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6712/2022. The petitioner, facing non-bailable charges, was rejected bail as no special circumstances were shown and there was no genuine illness making release necessary.
Bail application dismissed; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
6712/2022
Madan Tiwari S/o Shri Ghasi Tiwari, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of Vil. Hanumanpura, Ps. Shivdaspura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naman Yadav For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, Pp Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
02/01/2023
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk f'konkliqjk t;iqj nf{k.k esa iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 172@22 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 8@20 ,u Mh ih ,l ,DV esa fxjQ~rkjh dh vk'kadk ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] ftl Hkwfe ij xkats ds gjs ikS/ks mxkuk crk;k gS] mldk vfHk;qDr dk dksbZ laca/k ugha gS] vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh dh dgkuh vyx vyx gS] vfHk;qDr ofj"B ukxfjd gS rFkk dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku Hkh 'ks"k ugha gS] vr% vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
(2 of 2) [CRLMB6712/2022]
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, tkfgj fd;k fd ;g Hkwfe vfHk;qDr ds dCts'kqnk Fkh] ;|fi nsoLFkku foHkkx ds [kkrs dh gS ysfdu vfHk;qDr iqtkjh gksus ds ukrs bl Hkwfe ij dkfct Fkk] ekeyk xaHkhj gksuk crkrs gq, vfxze tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
gLrxr ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ij mlds dCts'kqnk d`f"kHkwfe ij 480 xkats ds gjs ikS/ks voS/k :i ls mxk;s tkus dk vkjksi /kkjk 8@20 ,uMhih,l ,DV ds rgr gSA
izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] vijk/k dh izd`fr ,oa xaHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ enu frokMh dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari/15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for anticipant bail under Section 438 CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madan Tiwari
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
