Single judge order dismissing an anticipatory bail application due to the absence of counsel for the accused-petitioner, citing want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
12147/2022
Mahesh Jat Son Of Dataram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Basna, Teh. Bansoor, Distt. Alwar
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None For : Mr. G.S. Rathore, GA-cumRespondent(s) AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
02/01/2023
No one is present on behalf of the accusedpetitioner.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
GAURAV SHARMA /19
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahesh Jat Son Of Dataram
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
