Bail application not pressed by petitioner; dismissed with liberty to file fresh application after recording eye-witness statements. Proceeding did not decide the substantive claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/013954]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 62/2023
Vinod S/o Lalshankar, Aged About 19 Years, Dhamod Falan Goga, P.s. Bichiwara, Dist. Dungarpur (Raj.). (Lodged In Dist. Jail, Dungarpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. ManojKumar Pareek |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
08/05/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present bail application at this stage and seeks liberty to file a fresh bail application after statements of eye witness- Lal Shankar are recorded.
Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
It is expected that the trial Court will record the statements of eye witness-Lal Shankar on priority basis.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
51-KshamaD/-
Vinod S/o Lalshankar
State Of Rajasthan
KULDEEP MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
