Allowed

Mohan Singh @ Hathi S/O Prabhu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Jul 2023CRLMB/6000/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by two accused persons charged under the Arms Act. The court, without expressing an opinion on merits, deemed it just and proper to grant bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Mohan Singh @ Hathi S/O Prabhu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶3

6000/2023

¶4

Mohan Singh @ Hathi S/o Prabhu Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kharbas, Alwar, Police Station Shivaji Park, Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶5

Girraj Singh S/o Pooran Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Budh Vihar, Kachchi Basti, Near Birai Mata Temple, Alwar, Police Station Shivaji Park, Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

11/07/2023

¶13

This bail application has been filed by petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.141/2023 registered at Police Station Shivaji Park, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 3/25(6) & 4/25 of Arms Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that accused-petitioners are innocent and they have been

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-6000/2023]

¶16

falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed. He also submits that accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners 1.Mohan Singh @ Hathi S/o Prabhu Singh & 2.Girraj Singh S/o Pooran Singh shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶21

DANISH USMANI /73

Mohan Singh @ Hathi S/O Prabhu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Singh @ Hathi S/O Prabhu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh S/O Hanuman Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal S/O Ramesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shanu @ Shahnawaj S/O Mo. Yunus Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Lalchand @ Lalaram @ Lala S/O Shri Kishorilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu @ Sonpaal S/O Durgalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Rav Gayakvad S/O Late Shri Durgashankar Vs State of Rajasthan