The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the petitioner's bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. charged with cheating and forgery offences, granting regular bail subject to a personal bond with sureties.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
7679/2023
Shanu @ Shahnawaj S/o Mo. Yunus Khan, R/o Street No. 4 Rangtalab P.s. Railway Colony Distt. Kota (City) Rajasthan (Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order
10/07/2023
This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.91/2023 registered at Police Station Railway Colony, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Section(s) 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the offence is triable by Magistrate and after investigation charge-sheet has been filed in the
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-7679/2023]
matter. He further submits that the similarly situated co-accused Haidar has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court itself. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Shanu @ Shahnawaj S/o Mo. Yunus Khan is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
GAURAV SHARMA /81
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shanu @ Shahnawaj S/o Mo. Yunus Khan
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
