Allowed

Mohammad Sajid @ Toni v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Feb 2023CRLMB/579/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court at Jodhpur granted bail to two petitioners arrested for offences under Sections 307, 120-B IPC, and the Arms Act. The court directed them to execute a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail conditionally upon execution of a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

Mohammad Sajid @ Toni Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/005358]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 579/2023

¶4

Mohammad Sajid @ Toni S/o Mohammad Shabir, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sarada Udaipur At Present Tenant Near Palodada House Savina Dist. Udaipur (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)

¶5

Anis Baksh S/o Kareem Baksh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Patel Circle Deewan Shah Colony Masjid Vali Gali Surajpole Udaipur (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	RS Rawal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	S.K. Bhati,P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

14/02/2023

¶14

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.521/2022 of Police Station Savina, District Udaipur for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 120-B IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation of firing is attributed to co-accused Hidayat Khan. It is further submitted that co-accused Imamulhaq has already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.12.2022. The accused-petitioner is in

[2023/RJJD/005358]

[CRLMB-579/2023]

(2 of 2)

judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶21

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners, (1) Mohammad Sajid @ Toni S/o Mohammad Shabir, and (2) Anis Baksh S/o Kareem Baksh shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.521/2022 of Police Station Savina, District Udaipur provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶23

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶24

101-Bharti/-

Mohammad Sajid @ Toni v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Sajid @ Toni v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Somaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Digamber Kupekar Vs State of Rajasthan

Tulsi Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh @ Mohit Vs State of Rajasthan