Allowed

Om Prakash v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Jan 2023CRLMB/567/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged with offences under the NDPS Act. The court ordered release on a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each for his appearance in trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Om Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 567/2023

¶3

Om Prakash S/o Hukma Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Chak 5 Rwm Panchayat 4 Rwm Tehsil Rawatsar Dist. Hanumangarh (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Nohar)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Jassa	Ram
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Javed	Gauri,PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

13/01/2023

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.515/2022 of Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh, for the offence punishable under Sections 8/21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. He further submits that the co-accused Gajanand Garg has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.10.2022. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accusedpetitioner.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-567/2023]

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶17

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Om Prakash S/o Hukma Ram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.515/2022 of Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶19

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶20

191-Hanuman/-

Om Prakash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neta Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhan Singh Vs State

Rameshchandra Vs State

Sharwan Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Vs State of Rajasthan