Allowed

Vijay v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Jan 2023CRLMB/519/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted bail to the accused-petitioner falsely implicated in offences under Sections 457, 380, and 411 IPC, directing release against a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail via personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Vijay Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 519/2023

¶3

Vijay S/o Shri Teja Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 58, Sureshiya Hanumangarh Junction Tehsil And District Hanumangarh. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Hanumangarh)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Birbal Ram Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Javed Gauri, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

13/01/2023

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.590/2022 of Police Station Hanumangarh Town, District Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380 & 411 IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and the offences are triable by first class Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is behind bars and the trial of the case will take time. He further submitted that the charge-sheet of the case has been filed. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-519/2023]

¶17

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vijay S/o Shri Teja Ram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.590/2022 of Police Station Hanumangarh Town, District Hanumangarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶19

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶20

170-nidhi/-

Vijay v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neta Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhan Singh Vs State

Rameshchandra Vs State

Sharwan Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Vs State of Rajasthan

Om Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan