Allowed

Akshay Kumar S/O Sh. Roshan Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jul 2023CRLMB/4857/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court exercised its inherent powers under Section 439 CrPC (Haryana CrPC) to allow bail for the petitioners, who were jointly charged under Section 363 BNSS (Haryana BNSS). The order was based on the court's observation that they joined the crime after it was committed, lack of prior criminal record, and the possibility of prosecution witnesses turning hostile.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed; Court quashed the order of arrest and directed the petitioners to produce a surety bond.

Akshay Kumar S/O Sh. Roshan Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶3

4857/2023

¶4

Akshay Kumar S/o Sh. Roshan Lal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bathoda Ki Dhani, P.s. Nangal Choudhary, Dist. Mahendragarh, Haryana. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail - Behror)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4862/2023

¶11

Umesh Kumar S/o Ravi Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Chandichana, P.s. Neemrana Dist. Alwar. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror Dist. Alwar.)

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Jain, Adv. For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP Respondent(s)

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶18

Order

¶19

06/07/2023

¶20

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq iFkd&iFkd tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk

¶21

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-4857/2023]

¶22

439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&cgjksM ftyk&vyoj ¼iqfyl ftyk&fHkokMh½ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 216@23 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 363 Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶23

pwafd mDr nksuksa tekur vkosnu ,d gh vijk/k ls lacaf/kr gksdj ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds laca/k esa izLrqr gq, gSa] vr% mDr nksuksa tekur vkosnuksa dk fuLrkj.k ,d gh vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶24

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa] mUgsa bl izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls vkfyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk fuosnu gS fd nksuksa ihfMrkvksa esa ls ,d 17 o"kZ ls vf/kd vk;q dh gksdj yxHkx o;Ld gS rFkk nwljh 18 o"kZ dh vk;q dh gks pqdh gS] nksuksa lxh cfgusa gSa rFkk mUgksaus /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFkuksa esa LosPN;k vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk tkus dk dFku fd;k gS] nq"deZ vkfn dk dksbZ vkjksi ugha gS] izdj.k esa ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶25

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶26

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶27

izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq,

¶28

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-4857/2023]

¶29

izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶30

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr 1- v{k; dqekj iq= jks'kuyky rFkk 2- mes'k dqekj iq= jfo dqekj dh vksj ls izLrqr nksuksa tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd }kjk ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkosa rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶31

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶32

Mittal /144-145

Akshay Kumar S/O Sh. Roshan Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akshay Kumar S/O Sh. Roshan Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Prakash @ Pappu S/O Shri Vidhyadhar Ji Vs State of Rajasthan

Nadeem S/O Sh. Nijar Mohammad Vs the State of Rajasthan

Abhinandan @ Rajveer Singh S/O Shri Satyanarayan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal Singoliya S/O Late Shri Ramesh Singoliya Vs State of Rajasthan

Prince Manoliya S/O Shri Panna Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Umesh Kumar S/O Ravi Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan