A criminal appeal filed by a judgment debtor residing in custody challenging a High Court order directing His Majestys' Government to relocate him and pursue litigation for the adjudication of his property rights.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 939/2023
Abhinandan @ Rajveer Singh S/o Shri Satyanarayan Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o House No. 630/44, Gali No. 3, Shiv Nagar, Foysagar Road, Police Station Ganj, District Ajmer (Currently In Judicial Custody At Central Jail Ajmer)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv. For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
05/07/2023
vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 14&, vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ;g tekur vihy v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ izdj.k] vtesj }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk jkexat ftyk vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &135@23 esa ikfjr
(2 of 3) [CRLAS-939/2023]
vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 19-04-23] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZ dk tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk [kkfjt fd;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g vihy is'k dh xbZ gSA
orZeku ekeys esa ifjoknh ds LFkku ij vU; O;fDr dks [kMk dj dwVjfpr nLrkost rS;kj djokus esa vihykFkhZ }kjk lg;ksx fd;s tkus dk vkjksi gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk dFku gS fd vihykFkhZ funksZ"k gS] vkjksfir vijk/k esa vihykFkhZ dh dksbZ Hkwfedk ugha gSA bl izdj.k esa ifjoknh dh iRuh o iq=h dks Hkh vfHk;qDr ds :i esa uketn fd;k x;k gS rFkk lkjh Hkwfedk mUgha dh izdV gks jgh gSA lg vfHk;qDr esok flag dh tekur led{k ihB } kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS rFkk vU; vfHk;qDr ekbZdy o vrqy tksu dh tekur fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr nks ekg ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vc dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku 'ks"k ugha gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% vihykFkhZ dh tekur vihy Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us nkSjkus cgl izdV fd;k fd izR;FkhZ@ifjoknh dks izdj.k dh lwpuk tfj, lacaf/kr Fkkukf/kdkjh ns nh xbZ gSA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vihy dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, tekur vihy [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
(3 of 3) [CRLAS-939/2023]
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA
izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa ,oa izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ vfHkuUnu mQZ jktohj flag iq= lR;ukjk;.k flag dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj dh tkrh gS vkSj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 19-04-23 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vihykFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari/565
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the appellant's special appeal challenging a High Court order that directed the State to relocate the appellant.
Abhinandan @ Rajveer Singh S/o Shri Satyanarayan Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Chiranji Lal S/o Shri Nathulal
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
