Allowed

Suresh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Jul 2023CRLMB/4796/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan Gopal Vyas allowed bail applications filed by four accused persons arrested in connection with FIR No.20/2023. Without expressing an opinion on the merits, the Court deemed it just and proper to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail in connection with FIR No.20/2023 upon execution of personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties including one local surety.

Suresh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:23212]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4796/2023

¶4

Suresh S/o Barji, Aged About 25 Years, Gundinaka, P.s. Ravti, Dist. Ratlam (Mp).

¶5

(Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Banswara).

¶6

Gopal S/o Nagji, Aged About 20 Years, Dungarapuja, P.s. Shivgarh, Dist. Ratlam (Mp). (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Banswara).

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4043/2023

¶13

Jitendra @ Sita Ram S/o Shri Nakuda, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Patada (Barada), Ps Badi-Sarvan, Dist. Ratlam (Mp). (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail, Kusalgarh).

¶14

Banti S/o Shri Rakma, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Dungrapunja, Ps Shivgarh, Dist. Ratlam (Mp). (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail Kusalgarh).

¶15

----Petitioners

¶16

Versus

¶17

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶18

----Respondent

¶19

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhawani Singh Mr. Hitendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mool Singh Bhati, Addl.GA with Mr. Prakash Panwar, Asst.GA

(2 of 3)

[2023:RJ-JD:23212]

[CRLMB-4796/2023]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶24

Order

¶25

25/07/2023

¶26

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.20/2023 of Police Station Patan, District Banswara for the offences punishable under Sections 458, 394, 323/34 IPC and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that offences are triable by the First Class Magistrate. It is further submitted that the injuries received by the injured persons are reported to be simple in nature. The accusedpetitioners are in judicial custody since long. Charge-sheet has been filed and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶28

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.

¶29

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶30

Accordingly, both these bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners, (1) Suresh S/o Barji, (2) Gopal S/o Nagji, (3) Jitendra @ Sita Ram S/o Shri Nakuda, and (4) Banti S/o Shri Rakma shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.20/2023 of Police Station Patan, District Banswara provided each of them executes a

[2023:RJ-JD:23212]

[CRLMB-4796/2023]

(3 of 3)

personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, including one local surety, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶35

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶36

98-99 Bharti/-

Suresh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tolaram @ Rakesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jayesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pappa Ram Vs Union of India

Jitendra @ Sita Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sabal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Soni Vs State of Rajasthan