Allowed

Vinod Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 May 2023CRLMB/4549/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan recorded that the petitioner was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. Without deciding on the merits, the Court held it to be just and proper to grant bail subject to execution of a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in connection with FIR No.33/2023 provided he executes a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Vinod Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/015092]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4549/2023

¶4

Vinod Kumar S/o Sahabram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 7 Bhompura Ps Hanumangarh Town Dist. Hanumangarh (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail Hanumangarh) Nohar

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Manoj Kumar Chotia
	Mr. Jogendra Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Arun Kumar,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS Order

¶11

15/05/2023

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.33/2023 of Police Station – Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this present case. It is further submitted that the alleged offences are triable by First Class Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶15

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-4549/2023]

¶17

[2023/RJJD/015092]

¶18

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Vinod Kumar S/o Sahabram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.33/2023 of Police Station – Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶21

7-neha/-

Vinod Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Executive Engineer, Phed,Elect.Dept. Vs Pravin

State of Rajasthan Vs M/S Fakirchand Ramlal

State Vs Smt.Naina Devi

Arvind Delu @ Dariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Deendayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Thana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan