Dismissed
State v. Smt.Naina Devi
Rajasthan HCCFA/90/1993
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appeal filed by the State was dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant on the dates of hearing or on the current date.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶2
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 90/1993
¶3
State
¶4
----Appellant
¶5
Versus
¶6
Smt.naina Devi
¶7
----Respondent
¶8
| For Appellant(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent |
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
¶10
Order
¶11
05/05/2023
¶12
On last dates of hearing i.e. on 04.04.2023, 13.04.2023 and 24.04.2023, no one was present on behalf of the appellant. Today, also, no one is present on behalf of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
State
- respondent
Smt. naina Devi
Coram
AI extract
Madan Gopal Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CFA/90/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court