Allowed

Aman Gujar @ Maya S/O Shri Ram Singh Gujar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Jun 2023CRLMB/4469/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court order admits a bail application filed by Aman Gujar against an order rejecting his plea in a criminal case involving theft, assault, and extortion. The court, without detailed merit analysis, allowed bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, stipulating appearance before courts as summoned.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each with stipulation of appearance.

Aman Gujar @ Maya S/O Shri Ram Singh Gujar Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4469/2023

¶3

Aman Gujar @ Maya S/o Shri Ram Singh Gujar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Plot No. 22-A, Behind Geejgarh House, Gali No. 3, Bais Godam, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atar Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Saini, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶10

Order

¶11

02/06/2023

¶12

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner against the impugned order dated 13.04.2023 passed by learned Court below for the offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 379 & 384 IPC in FIR No. 73/2023 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The accused-petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He is behind the bars since 06.04.2023. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude and till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose. He is ready and willing to furnish bail bonds for his release. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶14

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-4469/2023]

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶17

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶18

Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner namely - Aman Gujar @ Maya S/o Shri Ram Singh Gujar, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/(Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶19

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶20

SAHIL SONI /17

Aman Gujar @ Maya S/O Shri Ram Singh Gujar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman Gujar @ Maya S/O Shri Ram Singh Gujar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra @ Sunil S/O Shri Ramniwas Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep @ Kd S/O Balveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohit Morya S/O Shri Ramkumar Morya Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh Kumar Meena Son of Sh. Bhola Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Lekhram Meena S/O Shri Suresh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi Kumar Gupta S/O Late Shri Purshottam Lal Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan