In a bail application, the High Court declined to grant bail, observing that the petitioner had already participated as an interested party in other proceedings where bail was granted and considering the nature of charges.
Bail application was rejected; petitioner ordered to be proceeded with trial as per previous orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4352/2023
Lekhram Meena S/o Shri Suresh Chand, R/o Village Badeen, P.s. Mahuwa District Dausa.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
02/06/2023
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ys[kjke eh.kk dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 28-03-2023 ds fo:) vUrxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk mls iqfyl Fkkuk eqgkuk] t;iqj 'kgj nf{k.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 907@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 341] 392] 364,] 384 Hkk0na0la- esa vfxze tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk gS fd mls bl izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k tk jgk gSA izkFkhZ dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr ugha gSA izdj.k ds vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k uhjt ;kno ,oa lqjsUnz eh.kk dks bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk /kkjk 439 n0iz0la0 ds rgr tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) /kkjk 173 ¼8½ tk0QkSt0 esa vuqla/kku yafcr j[kk x;k gSA og vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj vuqla/kku esa lg;ksx djus dks rS;kj gSA vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gSA vr% izkFkhZ dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkosA
[CRLMB-4352/2023]
(2 of 2)
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd ds }kjk vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd bl izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh lfdz; Hkwfedk jgh gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr viuh fxjQ~rkjh ds Hk; ls yxkrkj Qjkj py jgk gSA iqfyl izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk lqjk[k nsus okys dks ikap gtkj :i, dk buke ?kksf"kr dj pqdh gSA vr% vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuki= dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa] fordksZa ij euu fd;kA dslMk;jh ,oa miyC/k nLrkostkr dk voyksdu fd;kA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku i=koyh esa tks lk{; vkbZ gS] mlls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vijk/k izekf.kr ekurs gq, mldh ryk'k tkjh j[kh xbZ gSA izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 173¼8½ n0iz0la0 esa vuqla/kku yafcr gS rFkk og vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj lg;ksx djus dks rS;kj gks] ,sls rF; izdV ugha gq, gSaA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk vijk/k izekf.kr ekuk x;k gSA vr% vuqla/kku ds nkSjku tks lk{; i=koyh esa vkbZ gS] mlls ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks bl izdj.k esa fdlh izdkj ls feF;k vkfyIr fd;k tk jgk gks] u gh ,slh dksbZ vkiokfnd ifjfLFkfr;ka izdV gqbZ gSa] ftlds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk ldrk gksA vr% nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkZs ,oa izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ys[kjke eh.kk iq= Jh lqjs'k pan dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 438 n0iz0la0 vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
MAHESH /75
Lekhram Meena
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharvani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
