Single judge order granting bail pending bail application. The High Court rejected the state's arguments that legal representatives of deceased persons had not joined the case and allowed the bail application to be transferred to the Sessions Court.
Bail granted pending application under Section 179 CrPC, 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Intzar Ali for complainant Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
19/01/2023
izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk fclkÅ] ftyk >qa>uw esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 179@2022 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 447] 427] 379] 34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fxjQ~rkjh dh vk'kadk ds QyLo:i vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd izLrqr ekeys esa izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls [ksr [kljk ua- 111 muds ds uke gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd ifjoknh i{k dk [kljk ua- 111 dh Hkwfe ij uk rks dksbZ LokfeRo gS] uk gh dksbZ dCtk gSA ifjoknh 40 lhesaV ds iksy yxkdj Hkwfe ij voS/k dCtk djuk pkg jgs Fks] ftUgs m[kkMdj izkFkhZx.k us iVd fn;k gSA izkFkhZx.k us dksbZ pksjh ugha dh gS] cfYd viuh laifRr dh j{kk esa gh dk;Z fd;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd fctyh dk eqvkotk uksfVl chdkusj [ksrMh Vªkalfe'ku fy- }kjk izkFkhZ lqjsUnz dqekj dks gh fn;k
(2 of 3)
[CRLMB-41/2023]
x;k gS rFkk fodz; i= fnukad 03-03-2021 tks fd eqerkt vyh }kjk [kljk ua- 106] 107 ds lanHkZ esa izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa ,d yk[k :i, udn ysdj fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns'k esa vafdr ftu xokgksa }kjk 'kiFk i= izLrqr fd, x, gS mudks muds }kjk fnukad 07-10-2022 dks ?kVuk ds iwoZ gh /kkjk 107] 116 ¼3½ n-iz-la- esa ikcan djk;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh ?kVuk esa dksbZ lafyIrrk ugha gSA vr% mUgs vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkosA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us fojks/k djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd izLrqr ekeys esa [kljk ua- 111 dh Hkwfe ij ifjoknh i{k dk iwoZ ls gh dCtk pyk vk jgk gS rFkk iqfyl vuqla/kku esa Hkh ifjoknh i{k dk dCtk gksuk ik;k x;k gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k us ifjoknh Ik{k dh dCtk'qknk Hkwfe ij dCtk djus ds fy, mDr Hkwfe dh rkjcanh dks rksMdj rkjksa dks pqjkus dk vijk/k fd;k gS] muls pksjh ds rkjksa dh cjkenxh dh tkuh 'ks"k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
eSaus i=koyh dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{kksa ds rdksZa ij xHkhjrkiwoZd euu fd;kA izLrqr ekeys esa i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ifjoknh vkfjQ [kku dh fjiksVZ ij eqdnek ua- 179@2022 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 447] 427] 379] 34 Hkk-n-la- esa eqdnek ntZ dj vuqla/kku fd;k tk jgk gSA izLrqr rF;kRed fjiksVZ esa iqfyl Fkkuk fclkÅ] ftyk >qa>uw }kjk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k egsUnz flag mQZ ckcw] lqjsUnz flag mQZ lqjsUnz dqekj mQZ ykyk ds fo:) vijk/k varxZr /kkjk&447] 427] 379] 34 Hkk-n-la- dk izekf.kr ik;k x;k gS rFkk muls pksjh fd;k x;k eky Hkh cjken fd;k tkuk viuh fjiksVZ esa vafdr fd;k x;k gS] lkFk gh iqfyl }kjk vius vuqla/kku esa ,oa rF;kRed fjiksVZ esa dCtkdk'r ifjoknh dk ekuk gSA izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ ugha gqvk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa izLrqr rdksZa ,oa izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk bl Lrj ij izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
(3 of 3)
[CRLMB-41/2023]
ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
Dinesh /53
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in a criminal bail application pending before the High Court.
Whether the legal representatives of deceased persons should have joined the case as parties.
Whether the order under Section 179 CrPC should be quashed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mahendra Singh S/o Berisal Singh
Surendra Singh
State Of Rajasthan
BHUWAN GOYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
