In a criminal bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan allowed the petitioner's plea to be released on bail under Section 439 CrPC from judicial custody due to a unique set of circumstances.
Petitioner released on bail directed to produce within 50 days and deposit security of Rs. 50,000 and furnish two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13344/2022
Tejsingh @ Teju S/o Rajendra Singh, Aged about 33 years, R/o House No. 132, Gali No. 2, Kamla Nehru Colony, Thana Shashtri Nagar, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.) Presently residing at House No. 1A 280, Kudi Housing Board, Thana Kudi Bhagtasani District Jodhpur (Raj) (At Present confined in District Jail Baran, Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Thakuriya Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
18/01/2023
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr rst flag mQZ rstw dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&dksrokyh] ftyk&ckajk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 443@2017 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@15] 8@21] 8@29 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
tekur vkosnu ij fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr rFkk fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dks lquk x;k] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og fnukad 12&08&2022 ls
(2 of 3)
[CRLMB-13344/2022]
vfHkj{kk esa gS] mlls fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ cjkenxh ugha dh tkuh gS] lgvfHk;qDrx.k dh tekur iwoZ esa Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, tekur izkFkZuki= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:} iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh] ftyk ckajk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 443@2017 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@15] 8@21] o 8@29 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- esa vuqla/kku ds nkSjku fxjQrkjh ls :giks'k gksus ds dkj.k /kkjk 173 ¼8½ n-iz-la- ds rgr vuqla/kku yfEcr j[krs gq, vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:} vkjksii= is'k fd;k x;k FkkA vc vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa fnukad 12&08&2022 dks fxjQrkj dj vfHkj{kk esa fy;k x;k gS] rc ls og iqfyl@U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gS] mlls fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ cjkenxh ugha dh tkuh gS] lgvfHk;qDrx.k txnh'k] euh"k dqekj] gtkjhyky o xksjhyky mQZ rstq dh tekur vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n-iz-la- iwoZ esa Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr rst flag mQZ rstw iq= jktsUnz flag dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-13344/2022]
vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq 50 gtkj #i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk 25&25 gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
( BHUWAN GOYAL ),J
mahesh /26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail was grantable in the special legal circumstances prevailing in this case.
Tejsingh @ Teju
State Of Rajasthan
Bhuwan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
