Allowed

Malik Ale Rasul v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 May 2023CRLMB/3786/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under IPC and IT Act sections. The court noted that the dispute was resolved amicably and granted bail without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in connection with FIR No.03/2023 upon executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties.

Malik Ale Rasul Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/016618]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3786/2023

¶4

Malik Ale Rasul S/o Sh. Malik Islam, Aged About 36 Years, Helashahi Purana Bazar, P.s. Purana Bazar, Dist. Bhadarak (Odisha). (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ranjeet Singh Chouhan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP
	Mr. Balveer Singh Rathore, for complainant

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

23/05/2023

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.03/2023 of Police Station – Hathipole, District Udaipur for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and Section 67-A, 66, 66-C of I.T. Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this present case. It is further submitted that parties have resolved their dispute amicably. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

[2023/RJJD/016618]

[CRLMB-3786/2023]

(2 of 2)

Learned counsel for the complainant has not disputed the aforesaid fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably.

¶20

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Malik Ale Rasul S/o Sh. Malik Islam shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.03/2023 of Police Station – Hathipole, District Udaipur, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/each, including one local surety to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶22

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶23

43-neha/-

Malik Ale Rasul v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malik Ale Rasul v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajeev Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Arbaz Vs State of Rajasthan

Madhavlal @ Madhu Vs State of Rajasthan

Kirtesh Dudawat Vs State of Rajasthan