Allowed

Ditin @ Nitin Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Feb 2023CRLMB/378/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding FIR No.663/2022, the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur, declining to express an opinion on merits, held it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail subject to a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each contingent on appearance before trial court.

Ditin @ Nitin Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/005394]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 378/2023

¶4

Ditin @ Nitin Sharma S/o Deshraj Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Chrak Hospital Sureshiya Hanumangarh Jn. Teh. And Dist. Hanumangarh (Presently Lodged At Dist. Jail Hanumangarh)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeetender Singh Khichi For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. K. Bhati, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

15/02/2023

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.663/2022 of Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh for the offence punishable under Sections 420 & 406 IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and the offences are triable by first class Magistrate. It is also submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed. The accused-petitioner is behind bars and the trial of the case will take time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

[2023/RJJD/005394]

[CRLMB-378/2023]

(2 of 2)

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ditin @ Nitin Sharma S/o Deshraj Sharma shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.663/2022 of Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶22

93-nidhi/-

Ditin @ Nitin Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ditin @ Nitin Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tulsi Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh @ Mohit Vs State of Rajasthan

Mandeep Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangilal @ M.K. Vs State of Rajasthan

Karan Singh @ Kalu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan