Allowed

Sunil v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 May 2023CRLMB/3452/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Sunil, who was arrested for offences under Sections 458 and 307 of IPC. The court noted the dispute was amicably resolved and ordered release on a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each on executing a personal bond.

Sunil Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/016028]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3452/2023

¶4

Sunil S/o Shri Shanker Lal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Baori, Kuwa Police Station, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur. (Confined In Sub Jail, Sagwara)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Jagatveer Singh Deora
	Mr.	Rajpal Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Laxman Solanki, PP
	Mr.	Dinesh Bishnoi,for complainant

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

18/05/2023

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.29/2023 of Police Station – Kuwa, District Dungarpur for the offences punishable under Sections 458 and 307 of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this present case. It is submitted that parties have resolved their dispute amicably. Challan has already been filed in the matter. There are no previous antecedents against the petitioner. The accusedpetitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

[2023/RJJD/016028]

[CRLMB-3452/2023]

(2 of 2)

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶19

Learned counsel for the complainant has not disputed the aforesaid fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably. 5) Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Sunil S/o Shri Shanker Lal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.29/2023 of Police Station – Kuwa, District Dungarpur, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶22

41-neha/-

Sunil v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Vs State of Rajasthan

Moti Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sajid Husain Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhanwarlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan