The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by five accused persons, directing them to surrender for regular bail within a specified time and prohibiting arrest until the trial court deals with the plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/016143]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
| ----Petitioners |
|---|
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For petitioners(s) : Mr. J. K. Haniya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
18/05/2023
Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, hence this bail application is rejected.
However, the petitioners is permitted to surrender before the concerned trial court on or before 29.05.2023 and file an application for regular bail and it is expected from the concerned trial court that the bail application will be decided on the same day
[2023/RJJD/016143] (2 of 2)
[CRLMB-2062/2023]
in accordance with law.
Till 29.05.2023, the petitioners shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No.255/2022, Police Station Sujangarh, District Churu for offence under Sections 307, 341, 323 & 143 of IPC.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
139-nidhi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners in the present criminal case.
Vikram Singh
Dilip Singh
Vikram S/o Hansraj
Sandeep S/o Hansraj
Hansraj S/o Todaram
State Of Rajasthan
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
