Allowed

Ajay Prakash @ Raju Son of Mukhram Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Aug 2023CRLMB/3325/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Single Judge allowed bail to two petitioners confined in Sub Jail Bandikui pending trial. The court noted the respondent State was initially absent but ultimately ordered release to avoid injustice, as the individuals are under remand awaiting trial.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail of Ajay Prakash and Bijendra Singh pending trial; accused to appear in custody proceedings if summoned again.

Ajay Prakash @ Raju Son of Mukhram Gurjar Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3325/2023

¶3

Ajay Prakash @ Raju Son Of Mukhram Gurjar, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Jeelo, Dhani Poswalon Ki Police Station Patan, District Sikar (Raj.) ( At Present Confined Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶4

Bijendra Singh Son Of Chhaju Singh Rajpoot, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Kali Pahadi, P.s. Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ( At Present Confined Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus ----Respondent

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Yadav, Adv. For : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP Respondent(s)

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

16/08/2023

¶12

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&ekuiqj ftyk&nkSlk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 332@22 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 457] 380] 427 Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k dk izFke tekur vkosnu vuqla/kku dh LVst ij

¶14

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-3325/2023]

¶15

[kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk] orZeku le; esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] yEcs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gS rFkk izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶16

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶17

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶18

vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ds i'pkr izdj.k esa vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] vfHk;qDr }kjk ,-Vh-,e- e'khu rFkk mlesa j[ks 11]23]000@& :i;s vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj ywV dkfjr djus dk vkjksi gS] vfHk;qDr djhc vkB ekg ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA

¶19

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶20

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr 1- vt; izdk'k mQZ jktw iq= eq[kjke xqtZj rFkk 2- fctsUnz flag iq= Nktwflag jktiwr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq

¶21

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-3325/2023]

¶22

izR;sd }kjk ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkosa rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

Mittal /36

Ajay Prakash @ Raju Son of Mukhram Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Prakash @ Raju Son of Mukhram Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Singh S/O Shambhu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Chetram and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Tolaram and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Prahalad S/O Shri Hari Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramphool Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Shashank Singh @ Golu S/O Sunil Singh Vs State of Rajasthan