The High Court in Jaipur dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the ground for提请 the petition had ceased to exist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Bhupender Pareek, Adv. |
|---|---|---|
| For | : Mr. |
Suresh Kumar, PP |
| Respondent(s) | Ms. | Neetu Choudhary, Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
14/08/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this criminal miscellaneous petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Gaurav/535
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lal Singh
Nemi Chand
State of Rajasthan
Sanwar Mal Kudi
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
