Disposed

Ravi Son of Shri Jagdish v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Sept 2023CRLMB/3237/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of connected bail applications filed by five petitioners. Postponing the decision to await the report of public prosecutors, the court directed the conviction petitioners to furnish bail bonds if they remain non-contract in other proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners were directed to appear and submit bail bonds; the final grant of bail is subject to the conditions laid down and further orders of the court.

Ravi Son of Shri Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:21352]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3237/2023

¶4

Ravi Son Of Shri Jagdish, Resident Of Longewala, Police Station Goluwala, District Hanumangarh(Raj.)(At Present Petitioner Confined At Central Jail Sevar Bharatpur)

¶5

Vishnu Son Of Shri Kartar, Resident Of Jawahar Nagar Colony, Aadampur Mandi, Police Station Aadampur, District Hisar(Haryana) (At Present Petitioner Confined At Central Jail Sevar Bharapur

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5648/2023

¶12

Nandkishor @ Nandu @ Dholya @ Bhura S/o Shri Biharilal Babriya, R/o Dosot, Police Station Neemrana, Police Station Bhiwadi, District Alwar. (Presently Confined At Bhusawar Jail Bharatpur)

¶13

Arvind S/o Rajveer Babriya, R/o Neemrana, Doulisinghpura, Police Station Neemrana, District Alwar, Presently Rended Ramsinghpura Railway Phatak Bagrana. (Presently Confined At Bhusawar Jail Bharatpur)

¶14

----Petitioners

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its PP

¶17

----Respondent

¶18

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6082/2023

¶19

Rajendra S/o Jagdish Bawariya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Longbala, Police Station Golwala, District Hanumangarh, Presently Tenant Ramsinghpura Phatak, Kacchhi Basti, Bagrana, Kanota, Jaipur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur)

----Petitioner

Versus

[2023:RJ-JP:21352]

[CRLMB-3237/2023]

(2 of 3)

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶26

----Respondent

¶27

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, P.P.

¶28

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶29

Order

¶30

06/09/2023

¶31

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- jfo] 2- fo".kq] 3- uanfd'kksj mQZ uUnw mQZ /kksfy;k mQZ Hkwjk] 4- vjfoUn ,oa 5- jktsUnz dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k dze'k% fnukafdr 13-03-2023] 27-04-2023 ,oa 26-04-2023 ds fo:) rhu iFkd&iFkd tekur izkFkZuk i=] n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk Hkqlkoj] ftyk Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 569@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 394] 395] 397] 457 ,oa 307 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd, tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;s x;s gSaA izLrqr rhuk s a tekur vkosnu i= ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k budk fuLrkj.k ,d gh vkns’k }kjk fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶32

cgl lquh xbZA

¶33

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks ekeys esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] os funksZ"k gaSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k jfo] jktsUnz fo".kq fnukad 29-01-2023 ls] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k vjfoUn ,oa uanfd'kksj mQZ uanw fnukad 05-02-2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izkFkhZx.k dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr ugha gSA fdlh Hkh xokg us vius dFkuksa esa ;g c;ku ugha fn;k gS fd os izkFkhZx.k dks ns[kdj igpku ldrs gSaA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd tc izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks fxjQrkj fd;k x;k] rc mUgsa ckinkZ ugha j[kk x;k gSA ?kVuk fnukad 04-10-2022 dh jgh gS] tcfd izkFkhZx.k dks ?kVuk ds djhc rhu eghus i'pkr fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZx.k dh

[2023:RJ-JP:21352]

[CRLMB-3237/2023]

(3 of 3)

la;qDr cjkenxh ls yksgs dk lcy cjken djuk crk;k x;k gSA ekeys dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶38

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k ,oa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶39

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa] fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k yEch vof/k ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA vr% nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdksZa] izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; ,oa vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶40

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr rhuksa tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkrs gaS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i,½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk”k; dh izLrqr dj nas fd os izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is”kh ij mifLFkr gksrs jgsaxs rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- jfo iq= Jh txnh'k] 2- fo".kq iq= Jh djrkj] 3- uanfd'kksj mQZ uUnw mQZ /kksfy;k mQZ Hkwjk iq= Jh fcgkjhyky] 4- vjfoUn iq= Jh jktohj ,oa 5- jktsUnz iq= Jh txnh'k ckofj;k dks ¼;fn os vU; fdlh izdj.k esa okafNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶41

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶42

AD/54-56

Ravi Son of Shri Jagdish v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Son of Shri Jagdish v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Singh Son of Shri Bodusingh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Sh. Deepanshu Sharma S/O Sh. Subhash Chandra Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Indar Pal Jangid S/O Late Shri Prabhu Dayal Jangid, Vs Dharm Chand Dharwal S/O Shri Ram Dayal Dharwal

Jyoti Verma D/O Shri Hanuman Sahai Balai, W/O Shri Sagar Nainiwal B/C Balai Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhupendra Kumar Son of Shri Chandu Ram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep Pahadiya S/O Shri Braj Mohan Pahadiya Vs State of Rajasthan