Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the accused-petitioner failed to enter appearance and seek prosecution on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:20962]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1509/2023
Sh. Deepanshu Sharma S/o Sh. Subhash Chandra Sharma, R/o A-328, Vrindavan Garden, Chipiyana Bujurg, Greater Noiida, Kheri G.b. Nagar, Uttar Pradesh 203207
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
05/09/2023
No one has entered appearance on behalf of the accusedpetitioner on the last two occasions and even today, no one has appeared on behalf of the accused-petitioner.
Therefore, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
SAHIL SONI /210
Deepanshu Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
