Allowed

Gajendra Kumar Jat @ Gajju Sunda S/O Tulsaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Jan 2023CRLMB/287/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur allowed bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner, Gajendra Kumar Jat, charged under Sections 323, 341, 392, 143 IPC, directing his release on a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail by executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Gajendra Kumar Jat @ Gajju Sunda S/O Tulsaram Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 287/2023

¶3

Gajendra Kumar Jat @ Gajju Sunda S/o Tulsaram, R/o Sundo Ki Dhani, Tan Bhojpura Kalan, Police Station Jobner District Jaipur (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anish Bhadala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shyam Prakash Sharma, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

11/01/2023

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.55/2022 of Police Station Rainwal, District Jaipur, for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 392, 143 IPC (In order offence under Sections 143, 341, 323, 395 IPC). He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused Aman Choudhary @ Boss & Akash @ Shutar have already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court and the case of present petitioner is similar to those of the co-accused. The accusedpetitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-287/2023]

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Gajendra Kumar Jat @ Gajju Sunda S/o Tulsaram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.55/2022 of Police Station Rainwal, District Jaipur provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶18

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶19

MS /32

Gajendra Kumar Jat @ Gajju Sunda S/O Tulsaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajendra Kumar Jat @ Gajju Sunda S/O Tulsaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Shahjad S/O Rukmudeen Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal Kishore Son of Shri Maliram Vs State of Rajasthan

Pyare Kuraishi S/O Asgar Kuraishi Vs State of Rajasthan

Nizamuddin S/O Sattar Vs State of Rajasthan

Munesh Kumar Bairwa S/O Late Sh. Jagguram Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Priyanka Wife of Shri Asif Vs State of Rajasthan