Allowed

Munesh Kumar Bairwa S/O Late Sh. Jagguram Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Jan 2023CRLMB/176/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application concerning offences under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B, and 420 IPC, the High Court, without expressing an opinion on merits, deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner who is in judicial custody, directing release upon execution of a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court until trial concludes.

Munesh Kumar Bairwa S/O Late Sh. Jagguram Bairwa Vs State… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 176/2023

¶3

Munesh Kumar Bairwa S/o Late Sh. Jagguram Bairwa, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Jat Baroda, Police Station Gangapur City District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shyam Prakash Sharma, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

11/01/2023

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.229/2022 of Police Station Chitrakoot, Jaipur (West), for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 420 IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶15

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-176/2023]

¶17

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Munesh Kumar Bairwa S/o Late Sh. Jagguram Bairwa shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.229/2022 of Police Station Chitrakoot, Jaipur (West) provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶19

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶20

MS /27

Munesh Kumar Bairwa S/O Late Sh. Jagguram Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munesh Kumar Bairwa S/O Late Sh. Jagguram Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Shahjad S/O Rukmudeen Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal Kishore Son of Shri Maliram Vs State of Rajasthan

Pyare Kuraishi S/O Asgar Kuraishi Vs State of Rajasthan

Nizamuddin S/O Sattar Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Priyanka Wife of Shri Asif Vs State of Rajasthan

Gajendra Kumar Jat @ Gajju Sunda S/O Tulsaram Vs State of Rajasthan