Allowed

Gopal S/O Ratanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Apr 2023CRLMB/250/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, accused of rape, applied for bail. He released on regular bail which was forfeited due to absconding. He filed a fresh application arguing the release was inadvertent and leaves were lost. Court granted bail requiring surrender in Magistrate Court and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted. Main accused required to surrender before Magistrate in 15 days and bring two sureties.

Gopal S/O Ratanlal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/005971]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 250/2023

¶4

Gopal S/o Ratanlal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kolukhedi Kalan P.s. Dangipura Dist. Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Respondent(s)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

06/04/2023

¶13

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&nkaxhiqjk ftyk&>kykokM esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 122@22 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 376Hkk-na-laesa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gSA okLro esa ifjoknh i{k }kjk vfHk;qDr ds lkFk ekjihV dh x;h Fkh ftlds ckcr~ ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 117@2022 fnukad 30-07-2022 dks ntZ djk;h Fkh ftlls cpus ds fy,

¶15

[2023/RJJP/005971]

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-250/2023]

¶17

fnukad 27-07-2022 dks dfFkr cykRdkj dh feF;k dgkuh crkdj fnukad 10-08-2022 dks orZeku izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ntZ djk;h x;h gS] izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶19

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr xksiky iq= jruyky dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

Mittal /41

Gopal S/O Ratanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal S/O Ratanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkumar S/O Bhagwansingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Haretilal Son of Kalyan Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Anoop Kumar Son of Shri Anegsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajeev @ Kalla Son of Shri Nanguram Vs State of Rajasthan

Netram Son of Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Son of Shri Kamal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan