Allowed

Rajeev @ Kalla Son of Shri Nanguram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Apr 2023CRLMB/128/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application admitted with notice. The condonation of delay in filing the application was accepted due to grievance caused by unlawful conduct of the Accused Petitioner. Bail was granted provided the petitioner fulfills criminal trial obligations and translates bond sureties.

What did the court decide?

Notice to prosecution to file representation; bail granted to petitioner subject to compliance with trial obligations and furnishing of bond sureties.

Rajeev @ Kalla Son of Shri Nanguram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/005950]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 128/2023

¶4

Rajeev @ Kalla Son Of Shri Nanguram, Resident Of Hingotwadi, Police Station Salempur, Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa (Raj.) ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Dausa)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Respondent(s)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

06/04/2023

¶13

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&lyseiqj ftyk&nkSlk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 91@22 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 363] 307] 34 Hkk-na-la- rFkk 3@25 vkElZ ,DV esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gSA okLro esa vkgr rFkk e`rd yk[ku ds isze laca/k Fks ftlls ifjokjtu lger ugha Fks vkSj Lo;a vkgr us ijs'kku gksdj vkRegR;k ds fy, Lo;a ij xksyh pyk;hA vfHk;qDr i{k dks

¶15

[2023/RJJP/005950]

¶16

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-128/2023]

¶17

feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k tk jgk gS ftlls ijs'kku gksdj yk[ku us vkRegR;k dj yhA izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶19

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ij ;g vkjksi gS fd lg&vfHk;qDr yk[ku us vkgr ds gkFk idMs rFkk orZeku vfHk;qDr us vkgr ds flj ij xksyh pyk;hA yk[ku }kjk vkRegR;k djus dk rF; i=koyh ij gSA orZeku vfHk;qDr fnukad 31-10-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gSA

¶21

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jktho mQZ dYyk iq= uaxwjke dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d

¶23

[2023/RJJP/005950]

¶24

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-128/2023]

¶25

yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

Mittal /38

Rajeev @ Kalla Son of Shri Nanguram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeev @ Kalla Son of Shri Nanguram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkumar S/O Bhagwansingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Haretilal Son of Kalyan Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Anoop Kumar Son of Shri Anegsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Netram Son of Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Son of Shri Kamal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopal S/O Ratanlal Vs State of Rajasthan