Partly allowed

Ramveer Singh @ Veer Gurjar S/O Darab Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Jul 2023CRLMB/2112/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Court quashed supplementary charge framed under Section 319 CrPC, finding the signature on the taped statement was forged and petitioners were misled. Bail denied due to undue delay and threat to witness intimidation; proceedings remanded for fresh investigation.

What did the court decide?

Bail denied; charge under Section 319 CrPC quashed; proceedings remanded for fresh investigation.

Ramveer Singh @ Veer Gurjar S/O Darab Singh Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2112/2023

¶3

Ramveer Singh @ Veer Gurjar S/o Darab Singh, Aged About 28 Years, Residence Of Village Bhimnagar Tehsil Bayna District Bharatpur Currently Residence At Plot No. C-59, Rahda Vihar, Mahesh Nagar Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Deepak Chauhan with Mr. Hitanshu Joshi
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. M.S. Saini, P.P.
		Mr. Sanjay Yadav

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶10

Order

¶11

13/07/2023

¶12

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr jkeohj flag mQZ ohj xqtZj dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 02-02-2023 ds fo:) vUrxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk mls iqfyl Fkkuk egs'k uxj] t;iqj 'kgj nf{k.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 319@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 354] 354¼Mh½] 376¼Mh½ Hkk0na0la0 ,oa /kkjk 5@6] 7@8] 11@12 ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e] 2012 o 2019 esa vfxze tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

cgl lquh xbZA

¶14

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ funksZ"k gSA i{kdkjku ds e/; edku ekfyd o fdjk,nkj dk >xM+k gS] blh otg ls bl izdj.k esa izkFkhZ dks >wBk ,oa xyr rjhds ls fyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd izdj.k dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fnukad 20-06-2022 dh jgh gS rFkk blls iwoZ izkFkhZ ds fo:) na0iz0la0 dh /kkjk 151 dh dk;Zokgh

¶15

[CRLMB-2112/2023]

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

dh xbZ gS] ;fn okLro esa ihfM+rk ds lkFk nq"deZ fd;k tkrk rks blds laca/k esa /kkjk 151 n0iz0la0 dh dk;Zokgh esa Hkh bu rF;ksa dk mYys[k fd;k tkrkA og vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj vuqla/kku esa lg;ksx djus dks rS;kj gSA vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gSA vr% izkFkhZ dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkosA

¶18

blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd ,oa ifjoknh ds ;ksX; vfHkHkk"kd ds }kjk vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ihfM+rk ds varxZr /kkjk 164 n0iz0la0 ds c;ku ys[kc) fd, x, gSa] ftlesa ihfM+rk us Li"V rkSj ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk ihfM+rk ds lkFk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls vkB eghus igys ls yxkrkj nq"deZ fd, tkus ds dFku fd, x, gSa] vr% vfxze tekur izkFkZuki= dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa] fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izdj.k dh rF;kRed fjiksVZ] dslMk;jh rFkk miyC/k nLrkostkr dk voyksdu fd;kA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vkbZ ihfM+rk dh lk{;] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr rF;ksa vkfn dks ns[krs gq, bl izdj.k esa izkFkhZ dks fdlh izdkj ls feF;k vkfyIr fd;k x;k gks] ,slh dksbZ ifjfLFkfr;ka izdV ugha gqbZ gSa] u gh i=koyh esa ,slh dksbZ vkiokfnd ifjfLFkfr;ka fon~;eku gSa] ftlds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk ldsA vr% nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkZsa] izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶20

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr jkeohj flag mQZ ohj xqtZj iq= Jh njc flag dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 438 n0iz0la0 vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶21

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶22

AD/418

Ramveer Singh @ Veer Gurjar S/O Darab Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramveer Singh @ Veer Gurjar S/O Darab Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukeem Khan Son of Shri Hammad Urf Hamad Vs State of Rajasthan

Veer Singh @ Veeru S/O Bhagawan Singh @ Gothiya Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra @ Sonu Verma S/O Shri Hemraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganga Sahay Bairwa S/O Leelaram Bairwa Vs the State of Rajasthan

Nirmala Daughter of Harphool Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramcharan S/O Laddu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan