Allowed

Mukeem Khan Son of Shri Hammad Urf Hamad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Jul 2023CRLMB/321/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting bail to petitioner Mukeem Khan under Section 439 CrPC as he is an essential witness whose presence in court cannot be secured in his absence. The court held the prosecution case has no future prospects since the witness confessed extrajudicially via his brother.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail under Section 439 CrPC as an essential witness in the pending trial.

Mukeem Khan Son of Shri Hammad Urf Hamad Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 321/2023

¶3

Mukeem Khan Son Of Shri Hammad Urf Hamad, Resident Of Village Pathrali Ps Gopalgarh Distt. Bharatpur ( Rajasthan) ( At Present Confined At Distt. Jail Bharatpur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanish Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Saini, P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶10

Order

¶11

12-07-2023

¶12

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eqdhe [kku dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 18-11-2022 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk mls iqfyl Fkkuk xksikyx<+] ftyk Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 54@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 307 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 3@25 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

cgl lquh xbZA

¶14

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ fnukad 04-04-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izkFkhZ ekSds ij ekStwn ugha FkkA izkFkhZ dks iqfyl }kjk ekeys esa >waBk fyIr fd;k gSA mls ?kVuk ds nks fnu ckn fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k gSA izdj.k esa vHkh rd fopkj.k izkjEHk ugha gqvk gSA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur ij NksM+k tkosA

¶15

[CRLMB-321/2023]

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr izdj.k esa eq[; vfHk;qDr gS] ftlds }kjk et:c rkfye ds xksyh ekjh xbZ gS] ftlds esfMdy nLrkost Hkh vkjksi i= ds lkFk is'k fd, x, gSa] ftlds vuqlkj et:c ds 'kjhj esa ls cqysV fudkyk x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vU; izdj.k Hkh yafcr gS a A vr% vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkosA

¶18

geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZ o fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izdj.k esa ipkZ c;ku esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) Li"V rkSj ij vkjksi gSa fd mlds }kjk et:c dks xksyh ekjh xbZ gS] ftlds laca/k esa esfMdy nLrkost Hkh miyC/k gSaA vr% vuqla/kku ds nkSjku tks lk{; vk;h gS o tks vk{ksi izkFkhZ ds fo:) vk, gSa mu ij o izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk rFkk vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶19

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eqdhe [kku iq= Jh gEen mQZ gken dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu i= varxZr /kkjk 439 n0iz0la0 Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gksus ls fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶20

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶21

AD/120

Mukeem Khan Son of Shri Hammad Urf Hamad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukeem Khan Son of Shri Hammad Urf Hamad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fazru S/O Lallu Vs State of Rajasthan

Asgar Khan S/O Samsudeen Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu Singh S/O Jaswant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Veer Singh @ Veeru S/O Bhagawan Singh @ Gothiya Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra @ Sonu Verma S/O Shri Hemraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopal S/O Jainarayan Vs State of Rajasthan