Allowed

Ashok Son of Ghanshyam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Jan 2023CRLMB/193/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for the petitioner charged with theft, directing release upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and no threat to witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioner to furnish Rs. 50,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each upon arrest.

Ashok Son of Ghanshyam Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 193/2023

¶3

Ashok Son Of Ghanshyam, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Fehdawati, Police Station Raini, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kirodee Lal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶10

Order

¶11

18/01/2023

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioner- Ashok Son Of Ghanshyam, in connection with FIR No. 340/2022 registered at Police Station Raini, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 379 IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The accused-petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offence. Trial is likely to take long time to conclude. The recovery of trolley was affected from the other accused person. Custodial interrogation of the present accused-petitioner would not be required in the matter. The other co-accused person has already been enlarged on bail by this Court. The petitioner is willing and ready to furnish bail bonds and sureties.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-193/2023]

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶17

Having considered the overall allegations leveled in the FIR and contentions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner. 5. Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner.

¶18

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Raini, District Alwar in F.I.R. No. 340/2022 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Ashok Son Of Ghanshyam, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶19

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶20

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶21

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶22

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶23

SAHIL SONI /119

Ashok Son of Ghanshyam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Son of Ghanshyam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Kumar S/O Ridhkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Roop Singh @ Ravi S/O Om Bihari Vs State of Rajasthan

Phoolwati W/O Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Indra D/O Bhagwandas Vs State of Rajasthan

Mona Devi W/O Lalit Kumarghod Vs State of Rajasthan

Omprakash @ Om Ji @ Omsingh Son of Shri Bhanwar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan