Allowed

Suresh Kumar @ Sura v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Apr 2023CRLMB/1898/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan Gopal Vyas allowed bail applications of Suresh Kumar and Dinesh, charged with robbery under Sections 395 and 397 IPC, directing their release on Rs. 1 lakh personal bonds with sufficient sureties under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Ordered that petitioners be released on bail on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Suresh Kumar @ Sura Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/011292]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1898/2023

¶4

Suresh Kumar @ Sura S/o Viniya, Aged About 24 Years, Kukawas, P.s. Mandawa, Dist. Udaipur (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1335/2023 Dinesh @ Didu S/o Dharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kukawas Ps Mandawa Dist. Udaipur Raj. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail Dungarpur)

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. AnujSahlot
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Arun Kumar,PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶17

Order

¶18

21/04/2023

¶19

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.05/2022 of Police Station – Mandawa, District Udaipur for the offences punishable under Sections 395 & 397 of the IPC. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this present case. It is further submitted that the co-accused Ajit Kumar & Mukesh Kumar

[2023/RJJD/011292]

[CRLMB-1898/2023]

(2 of 2)

have already been granted bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.4, Udaipur vide order dated 11.03.2022 & 09.02.2022. Charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter. The accusedpetitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and submitted that the petitioners are habitual offenders.

¶25

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶26

Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners - (1) Suresh

¶27

Kumar @ Sura S/o Viniya (2) Dinesh @ Didu S/o Dharma

¶28

shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.05/2022 of Police Station – Mandawa, District Udaipur, provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶29

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶30

10-11 neha/-

Suresh Kumar @ Sura v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar @ Sura v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Latha Anil @ Anka Vs State of Rajasthan

Sajaram @ Hojiya Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh @ Didu Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharampreet Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shamshad Khan Vs State of Rajasthan