Allowed

Surendra v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jan 2023CRLMB/16477/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed by two accused persons charged under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC. The court directed their release on bail subject to the execution of a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each to appear for trial.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail upon execution of a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Surendra Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 16477/2022

¶3

Surendra S/o Satpal, Aged About 25 Years, 22 M.l. Ganeshgarh, P.S. Chunawadh, Tehsil & District Sri Ganganagar.

¶4

Jai Singh S/o Bhadar Ram, Aged About 35 Years, 23 M.l. Ganeshgarh, P.S. Chunawadh, Tehsil & District Sri Ganganagar.

¶5

(At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Anopgarh).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yuvraj Singh for Mr. V.K. Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, Public Prosecutor

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶12

Order

¶13

03/01/2023

¶14

The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in connection with the FIR No. 763/2022 registered at Police Station Anopgarh, District Sriganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the offences alleged against the petitioners are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are behind the bars and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-16477/2022]

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Surendra S/o Satpal; and (2) Jai Singh S/o Bhadar Ram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 763/2022 registered at Police Station Anopgarh, District Sriganganagar provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶21

150-Mak/-

Surendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmi Lal Vs State

Mangi Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Harish Kumar Manwani Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Amar Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajunath Vs State of Rajasthan