Laxmi Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed an application for cancellation of interim bail granted to the accused respondent by the trial court, holding it infructuous as the petitioner (complainant) had already been enlarged on regular bail.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no specific relief granted.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 23/2022
Laxmi Lal S/o Shri Balu Ram, Aged About 25 Years, B/c Kumawat, R/o Sabalpura, P.s. Kareda, District Bhilwara.
----Petitioner
Versus
- State, Through Pp
- Satyanarayan @ Sattu S/o Shri Meghraj, R/o Sabalpra, P.s. Kareda, District Bhilwara.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RS Chundawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
02/01/2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present application for cancellation of interim bail granted to accused respondent No.2 is maintainable given the petitioner's subsequent grant of regular bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Laxmi Lal S/o Shri Balu Ram
- respondent
State
- respondent
Satyanarayan @ Sattu S/o Shri Meghraj
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLBC/23/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court