Allowed

Pooja @ Palak v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Jan 2023CRLMB/151/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed second bail applications filed by two accused persons arrested in a theft and kidnapping-related FIR. The court directed their release on bail upon execution of personal bonds with sureties, noting that the challan was presented and the trial would be lengthy.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on executing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Pooja @ Palak Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 152/2023

¶3

Satpal S/o Sonu Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhangur Tehsil And District Sirsa (Haryana) At Present Lodged At Sub Jail, Bhadra District Hanumangarh.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 151/2023 Pooja @ Palak D/o Gurpreet Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Aarshnagar, Mata Rani Mandir Govindgarh, Distt. Fatehgarh, Sahib Punjab, At Present Pooja @ Palak W/o Rahul Kumar S/o Gurpreet Singh, R/o House No. 07, Purani Basti, Tripura, Ward No. 05, Patiyala. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bikaner)

¶10

----Petitioner

¶11

Versus

¶12

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Madan Singh Rathore
	Mr. N.L. Joshi with
	Ms. Kirti Pareek
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. M.S. Bhati,PP.

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶16

Order

¶17

18/01/2023

¶18

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.413/2022 of Police Station Bhadra, Distt. Hanumangarh for the offence punishable under Sections 365, 364-A, 388, 323 and 143 of IPC. They have preferred these second bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The first bail applications were dismissed as

¶19

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-152/2023]

¶20

not pressed by this Court vide orders dated 20.10.2022 and 14.11.2022 respectively, with liberty to file afresh after filing of the challan.

¶21

Counsels for the petitioners submit that now the challan of the case has already been presented and no investigation is pending from the petitioners. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bails should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶22

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bails to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶23

Accordingly, the second bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Satpal S/o Sonu Singh & (2) Pooja @ Palak D/o Gurpreet Singh, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.413/2022 of Police Station Bhadra, Distt. Hanumangarh provided they execute a personal bonds in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶24

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶25

92-93 Ishan/-

Pooja @ Palak v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pooja @ Palak v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prathvi Dilawar Vs State of Rajasthan

Subhash Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Oad Vs State of Rajasthan

Genda Bano Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanna Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sampat Raj Rinwa Vs State of Rajasthan