The petitioner, having withdrawn the bail application, sought expedited trial. The court dismissed the abandoned bail application but directed the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously.
Bail application dismissed; trial court directed to expedite and conclude trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 249/2023
Arun Oad S/o Raju Oad, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Opposite Ranaji Bawaji Temple, Eklavya Colony, Ambamata P.S. Ambamata, Distt. Udaipur (Raj.)
(Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Anuj Sahlot, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
17/01/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present bail application, however, prays that the trial court may be directed to expedite the trial.
Accordingly, the criminal misc. second bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. The trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial as early as possible.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
126-NK/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arun Oad
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Manju Oad
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
