Court allowed regular bail applications filed by two accused persons under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Petitioners were granted release on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/006314]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
1417/2023
Antim Kumar Meena S/o Tejmal Meena, R/o Sarsiya, P.S. Jahajpur, Dist. Bhilwara. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bundi).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3694/2023
Chetan S/o Shankar Lal, R/o Radhika Bada, P.S. Jahajpur, Dist. Bhilwara. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bundi)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich, Adv. For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahla, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
12/04/2023
These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular
[2023/RJJP/006314]
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-1417/2023]
bail in FIR No.314/2022 registered at Police Station Dabalana, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Section(s) 452, 392, 307/34, 120B of IPC and Section(s) 3/25 of Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the accusedpetitioners are in judicial custody since 25.12.2022 and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the same.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
Therefore, these bail applications are allowed and accused-petitioners namely, 1. Antim Kumar Meena S/o Tejmal Meena 2. Chetan S/o Shankar Lal are ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in
[2023/RJJP/006314] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1417/2023]
the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
GAURAV SHARMA /29-30
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be enlarged on bail in connection with offences under sections 452, 392, 307/34, 120B of IPC and Arms Act.
Whether a personal bond needs to be furnished for release on bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Antim Kumar Meena
Chetan
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
